I would hate the option that ppl could give up so easily. Actually you know what? Please do add a surrender button, but everyone who presses surrender gets put in the leaver queue so they can play with all the trolls, feeders, and fellow quitters.
I actually like this idea. I think leaver queue would be too generous. Pro: -Allows players to agree to end a game quickly when gambling definition billion 2 team can agree games the game is over and lost and no games fun to play -Allows players to get back into queue faster for a chance at a match that is fun -Solves the problem of players feeling trapped in games with poorly matched comps, leavers, AI fill-ins, or toxic people.
Con: -Encourages defeatist attitudes and poor play -Ignores multiple comeback mechanisms built into the game to make comebacks possible surrender toxic behavior. Personally, I support adding the option. When the game feels like a prison that wastes your time rather than being fun, the game has failed its click here purpose which is to entertain.
The rationale is to see more a unanimous vote to end the game, while also preventing toxic behavior. The guy who "gg"s 30 sec into the game could initiate and be overruled quickly and easily. By creating a once-per-game option, it prevents spamming behavior. Once taken and failed, the read more must play on.
By requiring unanimity and giving the option to players to never surrender, they preserve the fun of people who want to games it out and try for a comeback. It preserves the status quo for all but the rarest situations, but provides a way to end miserable games. The biggest play with this, and the reason why I will always oppose a Surrender button, is if the vote fails, it will be twice as likely games the person initiating the vote will surrender deliberately throwing, or depending on the hero they play, griefing play others on their team.
There is simply no way you can force people to play nice, which is why certain types of things will never be added gambling games white the game. I will always support things like loss forgiveness, or maybe the team that loses with a bot still gets the win bonuses for playing through, but I will always oppose a Surrender option.
Sure, I have had miserable matches, so I understand why people want this, but I believe it would not be healthy for this game, as it was deliberately designed to encourage perseverance. Between the relatively short matches, the way certain heroes scale, and the comeback mechanics, I feel they are already fairly generous in giving incentives to keep trying.
IMO, that player would engage in toxic behavior play. They already think the game is lost. They already want it over with. They already afk in the base or feed.
As you said, nothing is going to stop the toxic player from being toxic, and we already have a reporting mechanism for that behavior. The only difference is that they would have a chance to surrender see if the rest of the team agrees and end it if and only if all 4 other team members agree. Again, if the vote fails, you still play to the end. I find the opposite to be true. If they thought they had a chance to forfeit, and no one agreed with them, that is when they would start with the trolling behavior.
That has been my experience in other games where the option worked like you suggested. Never happening. A mechanic that would have stopped me from playing through some games my greatest games play most of them victories in the end because the early game as awful. Surrender in game General Discussion. Kenned 14 September 1. Karabars 14 September 2. Triforce 14 September 3. Clipper 14 September 4. Riv 14 September 5.
Ugh this again. Clipper 14 September 6. MrFizzbin 14 September 7. Shadow 14 September 8. MaxSS 14 Surrender 9. Riv 14 September Xivilaikhys 14 Http://ganzbet.online/gambling-games/gambling-games-ministerial-game.php Joat 14 September This is a well-beaten dead horse.
Con: -Encourages defeatist attitudes and poor play -Ignores multiple comeback mechanisms built into the game to make comebacks possible -Encourages toxic behavior Personally, I support adding the option.
This is what I would suggest: It should be a one-time option. One vote. If it fails, you play to the end.
No spamming the button. Morthion 14 September Good; you can start by surrendering on this topic. Maximus 14 September Hoku 14 September HailFall 14 September Melke 14 September LittleFella play September
You are not right. Let's discuss it. Write to me in PM.
And still variants?